Attorney Detail Banner
Back to Attorneys
Newton, Jared W.
Direct Tel: +1 202 538 8108
Wilmington
Tel: +1 302 302 4000 Fax: +1 302 302 4010
Washington, D.C.
Tel: +1 202 538 8000 Fax: +1 202 538 8100

Jared Newton is partner in Quinn Emanuel’s Wilmington, Delaware and Washington, D.C. offices. He leads the firm’s intellectual property practice in Delaware, handling all manner of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret disputes before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the Delaware State Courts. Jared joined the firm in 2011, as a founding member of our Washington, DC office and industry-leading Section 337 practice before the United States International Trade Commission.

A former United States Patent Examiner, Jared brings a deep understanding of patent law to his litigation practice. He has taken dozens of patent cases to trial, securing verdicts and final judgments for clients on both sides of the “v.” In addition to his trial work, Jared routinely argues appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and represents clients in post-grant review proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

In the trade secret arena, Jared represents plaintiffs and defendants in high-profile disputes arising under the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and state trade secret laws. In 2018, he represented Waymo against Uber in a landmark trade secret trial related to autonomous-vehicle technology. The case settled mid-trial, with Waymo receiving Uber equity then valued at $245 million. Jared’s trade secret practice spans a range of technologies, from artificial intelligence to medical devices to jet engines. Jared also frequently advises clients on pre-litigation best practices for safeguarding trade secrets and protecting against claims of misappropriation.

Jared has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech and received his Juris Doctor from the George Washington University School of Law.

  • Becton Dickinson
  • C.R. Bard
  • EIZO
  • Google
  • NVIDIA
  • Qualcomm
  • Samsung
  • SawStop
  • TSMC
  • Varian Medical Systems
  • VIZIO
  • Waymo
  • On behalf of C.R. Bard, obtained a complete jury verdict finding willful infringement of patents related to vascular access ports.
  • On behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., secured a jury verdict of non-infringement for two patents related to search and synchronization technology.
  • On behalf of EIZO Corporation, obtained summary judgment of invalidity for patent related to calibrating display screens for medical applications. Argued the appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and won summary affirmance.
  • On behalf of Canon, argued and won an inter partes review proceeding that invalidated all claims of a patent related to digital-camera technology. On appeal, Jared argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and won summary affirmance.
  • On behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., argued a series of inter partes review hearings and obtained final written decisions invalidating competitor’s patents related to LTE technology that were asserted against Samsung in co-pending district court litigation.
  • Represented Waymo in a trade secret trial against Uber related autonomous-vehicle technology. The case settled during trial and resulted in a settlement for Waymo valued as $245 million in Uber equity.
  • Represented Neural Magic in a trade secret dispute against Meta related to machine-learning algorithms and software. Following the court’s rulings on summary judgment, the case settled before trial.
  • Represented SawStop in a Section 337 investigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission, where he co-led the trial and obtained an exclusion order barring importation of a competitor’s table saws found to infringe two asserted patents.
  • Represented Cree Inc. in a Section 337 Investigation related to light-emitting diodes and related products. Following trial, the ALJ found a violation in favor of Cree and ordered sanctions against the opposing side for discovery abuse.
  • Represented Varian Medical Systems in a Section 337 Investigation related to radiotherapy systems. Following trial, the ALJ found a violation in favor of Varian and the case settled favorably prior to a final Commission determination.
  • The George Washington University Law School
    (J.D., with Honors, 2010)
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University  
    (B.S., Mechanical Engineering, 2005)
  • The State Bar of Delaware
  • The State Bar of Virginia
  • The District of Columbia Bar
  • Registered to Practice Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. Patent & Trademark Office:
    • Patent Examiner, 2005-2009
  • U.S. International Trade Commission:
    • Law Clerk, 2010
  • Recognized by Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers: IP Litigation, Patent, Trade Secrets, 2025
  • Ranked in Legal 500 USA: Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation (ITC), “Recommended Lawyers,” 2024
  • Presenter, “The Intersection of AI and Patents, Trade Secrets, and Open Source,” Practising Law Institute (January 23, 2025).
  • Co-Author, "Good News For Trade Secret Actions At ITC."  Law360.  Portfolio Media. Inc.  (January 5, 2018). 
  • Member, ITC Trial Lawyers Association
  • Member, Federal Circuit Bar Association
  • Member, AIPLA
  • Member, ABA